Absolute Victory: PT LTI Overturns CIT Corrections on COGS and Fiscal Loss Compensation

PUT-001505.15/2021/PP/M.XB Year 2025 – June 23, 2025

Taxindo Prime Consulting
Monday, December 15, 2025 | 11:10 WIB
00:00
Optimized with Google Chrome
Absolute Victory: PT LTI Overturns CIT Corrections on COGS and Fiscal Loss Compensation

This Tax Court Decision is an example of comprehensive evidence presented by PT LTI in the dispute of Corporate Income Tax for Fiscal Year 2017. The Panel of Judges decided to Fully Grant the Appeal of the Appellant against the Objection Decision, cancelling all fiscal corrections which include two crucial items: Cost of Goods Sold (COGS) and Compensation of Losses from Previous Fiscal Years.

The COGS correction by the DGT was based on an allegation of cost charges exceeding the cost that should have been recognized. The DGT argued that based on the examination of the Taxpayer’s Financial Statements, the total purchase value per supplier was IDR 29,321,617,491, therefore the DGT did not accept the claim of actual purchases amounting to IDR 33,193,000,276 as argued by PT LTI. Moreover, in the General Ledger the inventory account included costs such as employee salaries, business travel, entertainment, and overtime which, according to the DGT, were not purchase transactions.

PT LTI denied that any state loss occurred, and stated that the issue was merely a formal error in completing Attachment II of the Corporate Income Tax Return. The Taxpayer argued that the COGS value reported in the Tax Return, which is IDR 29,321,617,491, was the same and correct amount based on accounting records.

The Panel of Judges then found a crucial fact that the DGT used the detailed Cost of Goods Sold per supplier (amounting to IDR 29,321,617,491) as the basis for purchase calculation, whereas the calculation of COGS itself should be derived from beginning inventory plus purchases minus ending inventory. The Panel also considered that employee salaries, business travel, and other costs disputed by the DGT may still be charged as COGS, as long as such costs are substantively direct costs related to the process of producing goods or services. Since there was no dispute over beginning and ending inventories which are the main components of COGS, the Panel concluded that the basis of correction used by the DGT—namely the detailed COGS per supplier as purchase data—was inaccurate and the COGS correction must be cancelled.

The second dispute is the negative correction of Loss Compensation amounting to IDR 1,075,947,714 (remaining loss of Fiscal Year 2014). The DGT argued that the remaining loss of 2014 should have been fully compensated in Fiscal Year 2017, because the Taxable Income (TI) of PT LTI in that year exceeded the amount of loss that could be compensated. However, PT LTI successfully presented evidence that the Fiscal Year 2014 loss had been utilized (compensated) gradually and correctly in the previous years up to 2017, and the amount of loss that could be compensated had gone through proper corrections and approval in the past. With complete evidence of loss utilization, the Panel cancelled the correction.

This total victory of PT LTI strengthens two principles of tax litigation: First, the Taxpayer must be able to explain and document in detail the classification of expenses and ensure accurate filing of the Tax Return. Second, for disputes related to Loss Compensation, the key to success is keeping and presenting the history of fiscal loss utilization in detail for each fiscal year to rebut any assumptions by the Tax Authority regarding unutilized losses.

Keywords: COGS Correction, Cost of Goods Sold, Loss Compensation, Purchases, Attachment II Corporate Income Tax Return, Deductibility, Burden of Proof, Taxindo Prime Consulting, TPC Transfer Pricing, Tax Litigation.

Comprehensive and Complete Analysis of This Dispute is Available Here

Sonya Marthayori, S.E., BKP (B)., APCIT
Sonya Marthayori, S.E., BKP (B)., APCIT
Tax, Customs, & Transfer Pricing Consultant

April 04, 2026 • Taxindo Prime Consulting | Adv. Muhammad Faiz Nur Abshar, S.H. - Lilik F Pracaya, Ak., CA., ME., BKP (C)

Tax Court Decision | PPN | Appeal | Fully Granted

PUT-002998.16/2024/PP/M.XA Of 2025 – 24 September 2025

April 04, 2026 • Taxindo Prime Consulting | Adv. Muhammad Faiz Nur Abshar, S.H. - Lilik F Pracaya, Ak., CA., ME., BKP (C)

Tax Court Decision | Income Tax Article 26 (Non-Final) | Appeal | Partially Granted

PUT-003062.13/2024/PP/M.IA Of 2025 – 24 September 2025

April 04, 2026 • Taxindo Prime Consulting | Adv. Muhammad Faiz Nur Abshar, S.H. - Lilik F Pracaya, Ak., CA., ME., BKP (C)

Tax Court Decision | Annual Corporate Income Tax | Appeal | To Reject the Appeal/ Lawsuit

PUT-002448.15/2022/PP/M.IVB Of 2025 – 25 September 2025

April 02, 2026 • Taxindo Prime Consulting | Adv Muhammad Faiz Nur Abshar, S.H. - Lilik F Pracaya, Ak., CA., ME., BKP (C)

Tax Court Decision | PPN | Appeal | To Reject the Appeal/ Lawsuit

PUT-002117.16/2024/PP/M.XIVB Of 2025 – May 15 2025

April 02, 2026 • Taxindo Prime Consulting | Adv Muhammad Faiz Nur Abshar, S.H. - Lilik F Pracaya, Ak., CA., ME., BKP (C)

Tax Court Decision | Annual Corporate Income Tax | Appeal | Fully Granted

PUT-002152.15/2024/PP/M.XXA Of 2025 – 22 May 2025

April 02, 2026 • Taxindo Prime Consulting | Adv. Muhammad Faiz Nur Abshar, S.H. - Lilik F Pracaya, Ak., CA., ME., BKP (C)

Tax Court Decision | Annual Corporate Income Tax | Appeal | Fully Granted

PUT-015139.15/2020/PP/M.XB Of 2025 – 27 May 2025

April 02, 2026 • Taxindo Prime Consulting | Adv Muhammad Faiz Nur Abshar, S.H. - Lilik F Pracaya, Ak., CA., ME., BKP (C)

Tax Court Decision | PPN | Appeal | Fully Granted

PUT-002157.16/2024/PP/M.XXA Of 2025 – 22 May 2025

April 02, 2026 • Taxindo Prime Consulting | Adv Muhammad Faiz Nur Abshar, S.H. - Lilik F Pracaya, Ak., CA., ME., BKP (C)

Tax Court Decision | Annual Corporate Income Tax | Appeal | To Reject the Appeal/ Lawsuit

PUT-002294.15/2023/PP/M.XIIIB Of 2025 – 20 May 2025

April 02, 2026 • Taxindo Prime Consulting | Adv. Muhammad Faiz Nur Abshar, S.H. - Lilik F Pracaya, Ak., CA., ME., BKP (C)

Tax Court Decision | Tax Lawsuit | Lawsuit | To Reject the Appeal/ Lawsuit

PUT-011578.99/2023/PP/M.XIVA Of 2025 – 11 June 2025

April 02, 2026 • Taxindo Prime Consulting | Adv. Muhammad Faiz Nur Abshar, S.H. - Lilik F Pracaya, Ak., CA., ME., BKP (C)

Tax Court Decision | Annual Corporate Income Tax | Appeal | To Reject the Appeal/ Lawsuit

PUT-012651.15/2022/PP/M.XVIIIA Of 2025 – 10 June 2025

Taxindo Prime Consulting (TPC) is a firm specializing in tax, accounting, business, and business law consulting.
Taxindo Prime Consulting (TPC) is established as a trusted strategic partner, providing comprehensive solutions in tax consulting, accounting, business development, and business law. Driven by a commitment to integrity and professionalism, TPC is dedicated to delivering more than just standard consultation; we provide education, tactical advice, and concrete solutions. Our services are meticulously designed to analyze and resolve clients' tax and business challenges with objectivity, in-depth insight, and full independence, ensuring both regulatory compliance and long-term business sustainability.
OFFICE
Mega Plaza Building 12th Floor
Jl. H.R. Rasuna Said Kav C-3 Jakarta 12940

Phone :
+62 21 521 2686
+62 817 001 3303

Email :
info@taxindo.co.id
Copyright © 2026 Taxindo Prime Consulting

All content on this website is provided solely for general informational and educational purposes. This information is not intended as a substitute for professional tax advice or consultation specific to your situation. We strongly encourage you to contact our team of consultants directly to receive appropriate guidance and advice.

Taxindo Prime Consulting
Tax and Transfer Pricing Calculator
Tax Calendar
×
Newsletter