The tax authority issued a correction on "Charge from related parties-IT services" amounting to IDR 288,097,740.00, citing the Taxpayer’s failure to prove economic substance and direct benefits. Referring to Article 18 paragraph (3) of the Income Tax Law and PER-22/PJ/2013, the Respondent argued that there were duplicated costs and a lack of demand from the recipient, given the company’s consecutive losses over six years.
The conflict intensified when the Respondent identified payments to third parties for similar services, interpreted as overlapping functions. However, PT KKM (Petitioner) argumentatively distinguished the roles between SCG CBM as a strategic/managerial IT provider and third-party technical vendors. The Petitioner emphasized that affiliated IT services included cyber crisis management and ERP digital solutions crucial for business continuity, regardless of the fiscal profit-loss position.
In its legal considerations, the Board of Judges emphasized that evidence in transfer pricing disputes regarding services must go beyond formal documentation. The Petitioner successfully presented concrete evidence, including operational email correspondence, a detailed Master Service Agreement, and payment trails aligned with the benefits received. The Board rejected the duplication argument as it was proven that the third parties were merely technical subcontractors to the group’s primary service provider.
This decision sends a strong message that globally integrated IT systems are legitimate components of 3M expenses (Obtaining, Collecting, and Maintaining income). As long as the Taxpayer can demonstrate that operations would be disrupted without such services, the costs are deductible. This victory underscores the importance of transparent supply chain documentation in affiliated transactions.
A Comprehensive Analysis and the Tax Court Decision on This Dispute Are Available Here