This case study highlights a dispute submitted by PT JMPR in the form of a Lawsuit for the Correction of a Decision over the Tax Court Decision Number: PUT-011400.16/2023/PP/M.XVIB Year 2025. The company filed a request for a decision correction on the grounds that the previous ruling failed to include the allocation of court costs to the Respondent, even though that ruling partially granted its appeal. The Appellant's arguments were based on Article 291 of Law Number 14 Year 2002 concerning the Tax Court, which regulates the assignment of court costs to the losing party.
The Plaintiff felt entitled to the allocation of court costs due to winning the dispute at the appeal level; however, the focus of their correction lawsuit was solely on the court cost aspect, rather than on the core tax dispute itself. This situation created an ambiguity of substance that potentially violated regulated procedures.
The Panel's legal considerations were based on Article 39 of Government Regulation Number 74 Year 2021, which explicitly states that a Tax Court Decision that can be subject to a judicial review application is a decision relating to a tax dispute, not a decision related to court costs. Thus, the Panel reasoned that the Appellant's application failed to satisfy the formal requirements to be the object of a correction lawsuit.
It stands as a precedent that a correction lawsuit cannot be utilized as an instrument to adjust non-substantial procedural aspects such as the assignment of court costs. Taxpayers and their legal counsels must understand that a lawsuit must focus on the core tax dispute regulated by law, rather than on technical administrative matters that do not impact the substance of the ruling.
The Appellant failed to win this lawsuit because the object of their claim did not satisfy the formal requirements regulated under the implementing regulations, which caused the lawsuit to be rejected. This demonstrates that mastering formal aspects is just as important as mastering substantial aspects in tax disputes.
This case study highlights a dispute submitted by PT JMPR in the form of a Lawsuit for the Correction of a Decision over the Tax Court Decision Number: PUT-011400.16/2023/PP/M.XVIB Year 2025. The company filed a request for a decision correction on the grounds that the previous ruling failed to include the allocation of court costs to the Respondent, even though that ruling partially granted its appeal. The Appellant's arguments were based on Article 291 of Law Number 14 Year 2002 concerning the Tax Court, which regulates the assignment of court costs to the losing party.
The Plaintiff felt entitled to the allocation of court costs due to winning the dispute at the appeal level; however, the focus of their correction lawsuit was solely on the court cost aspect, rather than on the core tax dispute itself. This situation created an ambiguity of substance that potentially violated regulated procedures.
The Panel's legal considerations were based on Article 39 of Government Regulation Number 74 Year 2021, which explicitly states that a Tax Court Decision that can be subject to a judicial review application is a decision relating to a tax dispute, not a decision related to court costs. Thus, the Panel reasoned that the Appellant's application failed to satisfy the formal requirements to be the object of a correction lawsuit.
It stands as a precedent that a correction lawsuit cannot be utilized as an instrument to adjust non-substantial procedural aspects such as the assignment of court costs. Taxpayers and their legal counsels must understand that a lawsuit must focus on the core tax dispute regulated by law, rather than on technical administrative matters that do not impact the substance of the ruling.
The Appellant failed to win this lawsuit because the object of their claim did not satisfy the formal requirements regulated under the implementing regulations, which caused the lawsuit to be rejected. This demonstrates that mastering formal aspects is just as important as mastering substantial aspects in tax disputes.
tpc.consulting 
tpc.consulting 
info@taxindo.co.id