The Directorate General of Taxes (DGT) conducts transfer pricing audits to evaluate the application of the Arm’s Length Principle regarding a Taxpayer’s related-party transactions. Tax examiners execute three critical stages: risk mapping preparation, audit implementation, and the reporting of audit results. During the implementation phase, examiners specifically analyze business characteristics, determine the appropriate transfer pricing methods, and perform an in-depth comparability analysis of the transactions. Regulation PER-22/PJ/2013 mandates that Taxpayers submit specific evidentiary documents, such as a Functional Analysis (FAR) and segmented financial statements, throughout this process. Consequently, business entities must proactively prepare their tax documentation to substantiate the economic substance of their transactions when facing an audit. .
In the era of global trade, transactions between parties with a special relationship (affiliated transactions) become a major focus of tax authorities. To ensure that these transactions are not utilized as a mode of tax avoidance through profit shifting, the Directorate General of Taxes (DGT) conducts testing known as a Transfer Pricing Audit.
This audit is essentially a test on the application of the Principle of Fairness and Business Prevalence (PKKU) or Arm’s Length Principle (ALP).
The first stage is preparation. Although procedurally this stage follows the general audit procedures applicable, in the context of transfer pricing, there are specific specifications.
The main focus of the tax auditor at this stage is the collection and review of initial data regarding the Taxpayer and its affiliates. The auditor must study Taxpayer data related to special relationships with transaction counterparties. This includes identifying business group structures, share ownership (both direct and indirect minimum 25%), or control relationships through management and technology.
The goal is to map tax avoidance risks before the field audit or office audit is actually executed.
This is the core of the transfer pricing audit process. Based on PER-22/PJ/2013, the execution stage is divided into three crucial steps that are interrelated:
This step aims to accurately understand how the Taxpayer runs its business. Without this understanding, the selection of comparable data will not be valid.
After business characteristics are understood, the next step is to select the most appropriate transfer pricing method (the most appropriate method). Method selection is based on suitability with transaction characteristics, availability of reliable comparable data, and level of comparability.
Methods that can be chosen include:
The final stage of execution is number testing. The auditor compares affiliated transactions with independent transactions (comparables).
The results of the analysis—including the selected method, comparables, and corrections—will be poured into the Audit Report (LHP) which becomes the basis for the issuance of the tax assessment letter.
To guarantee standardization, PER-22/PJ/2013 establishes specific document formats (Attachment II):
A transfer pricing audit is not merely a number check, but an in-depth analysis of economic functions and business substance. The key for Taxpayers to face this audit is documentation preparation consistent with the "Blue Side" principle, as well as a deep understanding of the stages regulated in the regulation.
Is My Company Required to Create a Transfer Pricing Document?