This dispute arose when the Defendant issued a Decree for the Execution of a Judicial Review Decision (SP2PK) which re-collected the entire original correction amounting to USD 1,388,102.13, even though the Supreme Court's review only covered a single, minor material item. The Plaintiff, PT ISI Tbk., argued that this action violated legal principles because other dispute items not submitted for Judicial Review (PK) should have remained subject to the Tax Court Decision, which had already acquired permanent legal force (inkracht).
The core of the conflict lies in the interpretation of the Judicial Review Decision's ruling, which stated "Annul the Tax Court Decision" in its entirety. The Defendant argued that such an annulment automatically returned the legal status to the initial Objection Decision. Conversely, the Plaintiff emphasized that according to the principle of tantum devolutum quantum appellatum, the Supreme Court is only authorized to decide on matters requested in the Memorandum of Judicial Review. Since the Defendant only contested the Advertising Expense correction of USD 1,652.50, collecting other items—such as Foreign Net Income and Negative Fiscal Adjustments—constituted an ultra petita act exceeding authority.
The Tax Court Panel of Judges, in its legal considerations, agreed with the Plaintiff. The Judges asserted that a Judicial Review Decision cannot be interpreted literally without considering the context of the dispute in the appeal memorandum. The Defendant’s action of reviving corrections that were already "lost" at the Appeal level and not appealed further was deemed a disregard for legal certainty. Correspondence from the Clerk of the Supreme Court further confirmed that the scope of the Judicial Review was indeed limited to that single item.
The resolution of this dispute was the cancellation of the rejection letter issued by the Defendant. The Panel ordered the SP2PK to be corrected to reflect the actual portion disputed at the Judicial Review level. The implications of this ruling are vital for national tax practice, as it reinforces that tax authorities cannot exploit "redactional loopholes" in court rulings to annul a Taxpayer's victory on dispute items that were not subject to further legal action.
In conclusion, legal certainty must be upheld through the honest execution of decisions in accordance with the scope of the dispute. The victory of PT ISI Tbk. serves as an important precedent that the execution of judicial decisions must respect parts of the ruling that have become inkracht to protect the constitutional rights of Taxpayers from arbitrary administrative actions.
A Comprehensive Analysis and the Tax Court Decision on This Dispute Are Available Here
tpc.consulting 
tpc.consulting 
info@taxindo.co.id