The dispute originated from a tax audit of PT TB, an e-commerce platform, where the Respondent made a positive correction to the VAT Tax Base (DPP) for the October 2013 Tax Period regarding the free provision of online classified advertising services. The core conflict lay in the differing methodologies for calculating "Other Values" as the Tax Base, where the Respondent assumed all operating expenses (SG&A) were components of the replacement value, while the Taxpayer argued that only the Cost of Goods Sold (COGS) for services should be considered, in accordance with accounting principles and VAT regulations.
The Respondent maintained its position by stating that PT TB is a service company that does not explicitly have a COGS account in its profit and loss statement; thus, all costs incurred during the fiscal year were deemed acquisition costs for the free services. Conversely, PT TB argumentatively proved that marketing costs, executive management salaries, and general administrative expenses did not directly contribute to the operation of the website used for free advertisements.
The Board of Judges, in its legal considerations, provided a balanced resolution by conducting a deep dive into 42 types of operating expenses. The Board emphasized that according to PMK-38/PMK.011/2013, the Tax Base for free provision is "Replacement value after deducting gross profit." Juridically, the Board agreed that only costs with a direct link to the service delivery—such as internet access, technical team salaries, and server maintenance—should be categorized as the Tax Base. Consequently, the Respondent's correction, which generalized all operating expenses, was significantly overturned. This ruling serves as a crucial precedent for digital companies in performing cost allocation to mitigate VAT exposure risks related to freemium strategies.
A Comprehensive Analysis and the Tax Court Decision on This Dispute Are Available Here
tpc.consulting 
tpc.consulting 
info@taxindo.co.id