Transfer pricing disputes have resurfaced in the palm oil industry, specifically concerning the examination of the Arm's Length Principle (ALP) on Fresh Fruit Bunch (FFB) toll manufacturing fees between affiliated parties. This case involving PT TBSM for the 2018 Fiscal Year focused on a positive correction of the Cost of Goods Sold (COGS) amounting to IDR 14,721,492,348 by the Respondent. The core of the conflict lay in the difference in processing tariffs, where the Respondent set a fair price of IDR 250/kg based on internal comparables, while the Petitioner applied a tariff of IDR 400/kg, citing the inclusion of real logistical and operational cost components.
The Respondent based the correction on Article 18 paragraph (3) of the Income Tax Law and PER-32/PJ/2011, arguing that the Petitioner could not provide a detailed breakdown of the cost components forming the IDR 400/kg tariff. However, during the trial, the Petitioner successfully demonstrated that the tariff increase was driven by rising energy costs and additional freight costs, all accurately recorded in audited financial statements. The dispute resolution was reached when the Board of Tax Judges ruled that the Respondent's comparability analysis was methodologically flawed for failing to prove that the internal comparable data used was truly "apple-to-apple" with the Petitioner's specific operational conditions.
The implications of this ruling emphasize that tax authorities cannot simply use comparable data without making adequate adjustments for differences in functions, assets, and risks (FAR). In conclusion, robust documentation and real evidence of the economic substance of a transaction are key for Taxpayers to defend their transfer pricing profiles before the Board of Judges.
A Comprehensive Analysis and the Tax Court Decision on This Dispute Are Available Here
tpc.consulting 
tpc.consulting 
info@taxindo.co.id