The dispute over the market value of shares transferred in Indonesia by a Non-Resident Taxpayer (WPLN) is at the heart of the Article 26 Income Tax case involving PT LCT. The conflict arose from the Respondent's correction of IDR 126,726,728,656.00, based on an internal assessment by the tax authorities regarding the value of 128.5 million shares of PT LCTN. The Respondent rejected the transaction value reported by the Petitioner, which was supported by an independent Public Appraiser Office (KJPP) report.
The core conflict centered on the differing valuation methodologies between the Petitioner’s KJPP and the Tax Assessment Team. The Respondent utilized market and income approaches (DCF). However, the Respondent used land comparison data that were not comparable in terms of size and location and committed fatal mathematical errors in the Discounted Cash Flow calculation. Conversely, the Petitioner maintained the KJPP's valuation, which was deemed more credible due to comprehensive field surveys and strict adherence to the Indonesian Valuation Standards (SPI).
The Board of Judges, in their legal opinion, provided critical notes on the validity of the Respondent's assessment. The Judges found that the Respondent explicitly admitted to calculation errors in their DCF method. Furthermore, in determining land value, the Board ruled that the comparison data used by the Petitioner’s KJPP had a significantly higher degree of comparability than the Respondent’s data, which failed to accurately consider economies of scale (land area) and physical conditions.
The resolution of this case resulted in the full granting of the appeal. This decision reinforces that tax authority assessments are not absolute and can be overturned if proven to contain methodological flaws or calculation errors. The implication for Taxpayers is the vital importance of engaging reputable independent appraisers (KJPP) and maintaining robust valuation documentation to withstand Arm's Length Principle testing by tax authorities.
In conclusion, the accuracy of comparable data and precision in mathematical calculations are non-negotiable in valuation disputes. PT LCT's victory proves that transparency in the valuation process and compliance with professional appraisal standards are key to winning transfer pricing disputes over non-cash assets.
A Comprehensive Analysis and the Tax Court Decision on This Dispute Are Available Here