This dispute originated from the Respondent's correction of the Article 26 paragraph (4) Income Tax rate, or Branch Profit Tax (BPT), on the net profit after tax of N 1 B.V. for the 2019 Fiscal Year. The Respondent applied a 20% rate in accordance with the domestic Income Tax Law, arguing that the Production Sharing Contract (PSC) is a lex specialis that "locks in" tax provisions at the time the contract was signed. Conversely, the Taxpayer asserted its right to use the 10% preferential rate as stipulated in the Indonesia-Netherlands Tax Treaty (P3B), given that the PSC explicitly requires the contractor to comply with Indonesian tax laws, which include ratified international agreements.
The core of the legal conflict lies in the interpretation of Article 33A paragraph (4) of the Income Tax Law, which governs tax treatment for oil and gas contractors. The Respondent argued that the provisions in the PSC are self-contained laws that override the Tax Treaty unless specifically mentioned. However, the Petitioner provided a strong rebuttal by referring to Section V Article 5.1.17 of the N PSC, which states the contractor is subject to Indonesian tax laws and their implementing regulations. Since the Tax Treaty is established under the mandate of Article 32A of the Income Tax Law, it is an integral part of national law and serves as a lex specialis over domestic statutes.
The Board of Judges, in its legal considerations, agreed with the Petitioner. The Board emphasized that the Tax Treaty holds supra-statutory standing in the context of international taxation. As long as the PSC refers to compliance with prevailing tax laws, the lower Tax Treaty rate must be applied to avoid double taxation. The Board found no basis for the Respondent to enforce a 20% rate when a valid international legal instrument (the Treaty) provides for 10%. Consequently, the Board of Judges overturned the Respondent's correction and granted the appeal in its entirety.
This decision reaffirms that oil and gas contracts cannot exist in isolation and ignore developments in international tax law recognized by the Indonesian government. For players in the upstream oil and gas industry, this ruling provides legal certainty that Tax Treaty benefits remain accessible as long as the relevant production sharing contract refers to general tax laws. This serves as a vital precedent in maintaining a competitive investment climate for Indonesian oil and gas, aligned with global tax treatment standards.
A Comprehensive Analysis and the Tax Court Decision on This Dispute Are Available Here
tpc.consulting 
tpc.consulting 
info@taxindo.co.id