The tax dispute between PT MRP and the Directorate General of Taxes (DGT) culminated in the dismissal of the appeal regarding the Cost of Goods Sold (COGS) adjustment amounting to IDR 6,738,747,019 for the 2020 Fiscal Year. The primary focus centered on Article 6 paragraph (1) of the Income Tax Law concerning deductible expenses.
The DGT questioned the existence of raw material purchases because the Petitioner could not present original invoices, cooperation contracts, or bank payment slips. While the Taxpayer argued that the COVID-19 pandemic hindered document collection and relied on the "matching cost against revenue" principle, the Respondent maintained that bookkeeping must be supported by external evidence.
The Board of Judges emphasized that under the self-assessment system, the burden of proof for deductible expenses rests entirely with the Taxpayer. The Judges found that internal bookkeeping records alone lacked evidentiary weight because they were not reconciled with proof of payment to suppliers. Without perfect vouching, the Court was unconvinced that the expenditures truly occurred for the purpose of obtaining, collecting, and maintaining income (3M costs).
The dismissal serves as a stern warning: internal bookkeeping is insufficient to defend costs in court without supporting third-party evidence. Companies must ensure that document flow, goods flow, and cash flow are synchronized and easily validated. This ruling reaffirms that material evidence standards are non-negotiable in tax litigation.
In conclusion, the tax authority's victory was based on the Taxpayer's failure to meet formal documentation requirements. To mitigate future risks, businesses must strengthen their SOPs for transaction archiving, ensuring that every significant cost item is backed by a verifiable paper trail.
A Comprehensive Analysis and the Tax Court Decision on This Dispute Are Available Here
tpc.consulting 
tpc.consulting 
info@taxindo.co.id