The correction of the VAT Base (DPP) amounting to IDR 2,316,131,172.00 imposed by the Respondent against CV AM was ultimately fully annulled by the Tax Court. This dispute centered on interpreting the reconciliation results between business turnover in the Corporate Income Tax Return and deliveries in the VAT Return for December 2016. While the Respondent used the discrepancy as a basis for identifying unreported taxable deliveries, they failed to present concrete transactional evidence to support this assumption during the trial proceedings.
The core of the conflict lies in the validity of using turnover reconciliation as the sole evidence for tax correction. The Respondent argued that any positive discrepancy found during data reconciliation automatically constitutes a VAT-able object. Conversely, CV AM provided a robust rebuttal by demonstrating that its tax reporting was based on valid source documents and that the identified difference did not represent an actual delivery of taxable goods. The Respondent's inability to prove the underlying flow of goods or cash became the turning point for the Taxpayer’s victory.
In its legal considerations, the Board of Judges emphasized that tax corrections must not be based solely on paper-based assumptions without being supported by tangible material evidence. Since the Respondent could not convincingly prove the existence of unreported deliveries, the Board decided to grant CV AM’s appeal in its entirety. This decision reinforces the principle that reconciliation is merely a diagnostic tool rather than absolute proof of a taxable transaction. In conclusion, administrative order and the availability of source documents remain the primary keys to winning disputes arising from revenue reconciliation.
A Comprehensive Analysis and the Tax Court Decision on This Dispute Are Available Here
tpc.consulting 
tpc.consulting 
info@taxindo.co.id