The dispute arose when the Directorate General of Taxation (DGT) adjusted the VAT Base (DPP) for the March 2020 Tax Period for PT API, amounting to IDR 50,516,215, derived from promotion expenses. The DGT assumed that expenditures for souvenirs, advertising media, and demo materials constituted a delivery of Taxable Goods (BKP) in the form of free gifts, as regulated under Article 1A paragraph (1) letter d of the VAT Law.
During the hearing, PT API as the Applicant presented a compelling argument that the corrected items, such as goody bags, prayer mats, and dealing chairs, were not production goods or items traded by the company, but rather marketing support tools. PT API emphasized that according to PMK Number 121/PM.03/2015, the "Other Value" used as the VAT base for free gifts is the Selling Price minus gross profit. Since these souvenirs were not the company's primary trade objects (decorative paints), they contained no gross profit component, thus failing the technical criteria for Other Value calculation.
The Tax Court Judges shared the Applicant's legal perspective. The Judges affirmed that the essence of VAT imposition on free gifts should be limited to goods that are the business objects or traded goods of the Taxpayer. Considering that the promotional items were not traded by PT API and functioned as costs to earn income, the delivery could not be categorized as a taxable delivery of BKP subject to VAT.
The implications of this ruling provide legal certainty for Taxpayers that not all promotional expenses in the form of goods are automatically subject to VAT as free gifts. This decision reinforces that the limits of VAT objects for free gifts must be linked to the type of business and whether the goods are merchandise containing a profit component. Consequently, the Board of Judges granted the Applicant's appeal in its entirety and annulled the DGT's correction.
A Comprehensive Analysis and the Tax Court Decision on This Dispute Are Available Here