Income Tax Article 21/26 (PPh Pasal 21/26)
Other Related Topics

Employee Loans: When Do They Become Taxable Income (PPh 21)?

Taxindo Prime Consulting | Irfan Gunawan, S.Ak, BKP., CTT., CPTT. - Lilik F Pracaya, Ak., CA., ME., BKP (C) • 04 Januari 2026
00:00
Optimized with Google Chrome

In employee retention strategies, companies often provide soft loans with low interest or even zero interest (0%). Previously, this area was often a "gray area." However, with the enactment of technical regulations on benefits in kind (natura/kenikmatan) following the Harmonization of Tax Regulations Law (UU HPP), the tax treatment is now very specific.

The key lies in the concept of "Price Reduction Facility" as a benefit in kind. Here is the comprehensive review.

Basic Principle: Cost of Funds vs. Employee Interest

Based on MoF Regulation (PMK) 66 of 2023 and its affirmation in DGT Memorandum ND-14/PJ/PJ.02/2024, loans provided to employees are considered an Object of PPh Article 21 (Benefit in Kind) if specific conditions are met.

A tax object arises if the interest paid by the employee is lower than the Cost of Funds incurred by the company to obtain those funds.

Taxable Benefit Formula: $$Benefit\ Value = (Company's\ Cost\ of\ Funds) - (Interest\ Paid\ by\ Employee)$$

Scenario 1: Interest-Free Loan (0%)

If the company provides a loan without interest, the difference between the company's Cost of Funds and 0% (employee interest) will be considered additional income for the employee and subject to PPh 21 withholding.

Important:

  • If the company uses its own funds (retained earnings/equity) and has no interest expense (cost of funds) on those funds, technically the benefit value is 0. This means there is no PPh 21 object to withhold because there is no cost difference borne by the company.
  • However, if the company borrows funds from a third party (e.g., a Bank) to lend to employees at 0%, the interest expense paid by the company to the Bank becomes taxable income for the employee.

Scenario 2: Below-Market Interest Rate

In this scenario, the employee pays interest, but the rate is lower than the cost of funds borne by the company.

Case Example:

PT Maju Jaya borrows funds from Bank ABC at 12% per annum (Cost of Funds). These funds are then channeled as a loan to Mr. B (employee) at a special rate of 4% per annum.

PPh 21 Analysis: Since the employee rate (4%) is lower than the company's cost of funds (12%), there is a difference of 8%. This 8% of the loan principal is calculated as a Benefit in Kind each month and is subject to PPh Article 21 withholding.

Calculation Illustration (According to ND-14/2024)

Let's look at a specific example regulated in the memorandum: Mrs. K (a Bank employee) borrows Rp1,500,000,000 from her employer.

  • General market rate: 14%.
  • Cost of Funds incurred by the Bank: 11%.
  • Interest charged to Mrs. K: 13%.

Analysis: Although Mrs. K receives a rate (13%) cheaper than the market (14%), the interest she pays is higher than the company's cost of funds (11%).

Result: There is no benefit/income that becomes an object of PPh Article 21 for Mrs. K because the company does not "lose money" or subsidize the cost of funds in real terms.

Corporate Tax Treatment (For the Company)

For the company, the interest cost difference borne (interest subsidy) for the employee constitutes a cost related to the employment relationship. Therefore, this cost is a deductible expense from the company's gross income when calculating Corporate Income Tax, provided the Taxable-Deductible principle is met.

Conclusion

Providing soft loans to employees now requires HR and Tax teams to scrutinize the source of funds. If the funds come from third-party loans that carry interest charges (cost of funds), the interest subsidy given to the employee is an object of PPh 21. However, if the interest paid by the employee is already above the company's cost of funds, there is no additional PPh 21 impact.

Regulatory References:

  1. Government Regulation Number 55 of 2022 concerning Adjustments to Regulations in the Field of Income Tax.
  2. Minister of Finance Regulation Number 66 of 2023 concerning Income Tax Treatment on Reimbursement or Compensation in Connection with Work or Services Received or Obtained in the Form of In-Kind and/or Benefits.
  3. Memorandum of the Director General of Taxes Number ND-14/PJ/PJ.02/2024 concerning Affirmation of the Implementation of PMK 66 of 2023.
Lilik F Pracaya, Ak., CA., ME., BKP (C) - Transfer Pricing Specialist UK-ADIT
Telah dikurasi oleh
Lilik F Pracaya, Ak., CA., ME., BKP (C) - Transfer Pricing Specialist UK-ADIT
Managing Director/ Managing Partner
Taxindo Prime Consulting (TPC) is a firm specializing in tax, accounting, business, and business law consulting.
Taxindo Prime Consulting (TPC) is established as a trusted strategic partner, providing comprehensive solutions in tax consulting, accounting, business development, and business law. Driven by a commitment to integrity and professionalism, TPC is dedicated to delivering more than just standard consultation; we provide education, tactical advice, and concrete solutions. Our services are meticulously designed to analyze and resolve clients' tax and business challenges with objectivity, in-depth insight, and full independence, ensuring both regulatory compliance and long-term business sustainability.
OFFICE
Mega Plaza Building 12th Floor
Jl. H.R. Rasuna Said Kav C-3 Jakarta 12940

Phone :
+62 21 521 2686
+62 817 001 3303

Email :
info@taxindo.co.id
Copyright © 2025 Taxindo Prime Consulting

All content on this website is provided solely for general informational and educational purposes. This information is not intended as a substitute for professional tax advice or consultation specific to your situation. We strongly encourage you to contact our team of consultants directly to receive appropriate guidance and advice.

Taxindo Prime Consulting
Tax and Transfer Pricing Calculator
Tax Calendar
×
Newsletter